Talk:Fraud and Scam Center/@comment-69.152.210.252-20121206042845/@comment-5877143-20121216090532

I believe part of the blame for not truly weighing in the "facts" and making a judgement based on beyond the doubt reasoning and not assumption is the fault of an admin for making hasty decisions without more proof. Label someone when you yourself is not sure beyond the doubt.

If you look at it again, you will know what I mean. Those pictures of gallery were taken a while ago and he is using it to pretend he never had my card.

You as an admin was supposed to find proof without a doubt.

Example: Just because someone was at the scene of a crime, does not mean they did it, until proven without a doubt. He is a suspect.

You did not even choose to look into the facts and see how they are not even evidence at all, but allowed yourself to believe it to be true.

You as an admin have yourself corrupted the system of helping others from scammers, by accusing an innocent and letting a scammer run free.

If you were righteous, you would have looked further into it.

If you know your mistake after reading what I wrote, you would take the name off until further proof is given.

That is all I have to say, now I have to believe that you are someone who does what is right and understand where I am coming from.